Associations of Combustible Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Use With COVID Infection and Severity in the U.S.: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2021 National Health Information Survey.

Given the potential respiratory health risks, the association of COVID infection and the use of combustible cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), and concurrent dual use is a priority for public health. Many published reports have not accounted for known covarying factors. This study sought to calculate adjusted odds ratios for self-reported COVID infection and disease severity as a function of smoking and ENDS use, while accounting for factors known to influence COVID infection and disease severity (i.e., age, sex, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status and educational attainment, rural or urban environment, self-reported diabetes, COPD, coronary heart disease, and obesity status). Data from the 2021 U.S. National Health Interview Survey, a cross-sectional questionnaire design, were used to calculate both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for self-reported COVID infection and severity of symptoms. Results indicate that combustible cigarette use is associated with a lower likelihood of self-reported COVID infection relative to non-use of tobacco products (AOR = .64; 95% CI [.55, .74]), whereas ENDS use is associated with a higher likelihood of self-reported COVID infection (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI [1.04, 1.63]). There was no significant difference in COVID infection among dual users (ENDS and combustible use) when compared with non-users. Adjusting for covarying factors did not substantially change the results. There were no significant differences in COVID disease severity between those of varying smoking status. Future research should examine the relationship between smoking status and COVID infection and disease severity utilizing longitudinal study designs and non-self-report measures of smoking status (e.g., the biomarker cotinine), COVID infection (e.g., positive tests), and disease severity (e.g., hospitalizations, ventilator assistance, mortality, and ongoing symptoms of long COVID).

Covishield vaccination and pulmonary thromboembolism: A coincidence or a causal association?

With the eruption of COVID pandemic, many cases of thromboembolic events in association with the COVID infection were reported suggesting the prothrombotic state associated with the infection. After a few years, eventually some of the COVID vaccines came into implementation. With the discovery and implementation of COVID vaccinations, a very few cases have been reported to have developed thromboembolic events, including pulmonary thromboembolism. Different types of vaccines have been associated with different rates of thromboembolic events. Covishield vaccine is rarely associated with thrombotic complications. In the case report below, we present a case summary of a young married female, who presented with shortness of breath a week after the Covishield vaccination and presented to our tertiary care center with further worsening of symptoms during a course of 6 months. On detailed workup, she was diagnosed to have a large pulmonary thrombus affecting the left main pulmonary artery. Other possible etiologies of the hypercoagulable states were ruled out. Though COVID vaccines are known to induce prothrombotic state in the body, we could not be sure if it was the actual cause for the pulmonary thromboembolism or just a coincidence.

Covid-associated psychosis - A challenge for expert opinion.

Discussed is the case of a 41-year-old pilot with no relevant psychiatric history who presented with headache, fatigue, and lack of drive in the context of a confirmed mild COVID infection. At the same time he suffered from a paranoid symptomatology persisting for several weeks. After remission the patient remained stable also after discontinuation of neuroleptic medication. CCT, NMR, CSF were normal. The interrelationship between COVID and acute psychosis is discussed.Copyright © 2023 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.

Grisel's Syndrome and Covid Infection in Children: Report of Two Cases

Introduction: Grisel syndrome is a rare condition of rotator subluxation of the atlantoaxial joint that is not associated with trauma or bone lesion. It is characterized by acute and painful torticollis with fever, which is a consequence of complicated pharyngitis and tonsillitis. Material(s) and Method(s): We present two girls, aged 5 and 6 years, who developed atlantoaxial subluxation and torticollis during or after infection with COVID. As part of this, a pararetropharyngeal abscess developed. Based on clinical signs, radiological findings, and the course of the disease, Grisel's syndrome was confirmed. One patient had an asymptomatic COVID infection, before the development of Grisel's syndrome, and the other patient had an active COVID infection, during which Grisel's syndrome developed. Result(s): Both patients were treated multidisciplinary: conservatively with antibiotics and surgically, and then physical therapy was introduced along with the Philadelphia orthosis. Both were in constant clinical improvement and did not develop further complications. According to the literature, the Fielding-Hawkins classification describes 4 degrees of this subluxation, and our patients had type 3 at the time of diagnosis. Conclusion(s): Grisel's syndrome is a rare condition and should be suspected in children with painful torticollis after infections or head and neck surgery. The importance of this syndrome for maxillofacial surgeons is in early differential diagnosis, to avoid early and late consequences of undiagnosed pararetropharyngeal abscess and atlantoaxial subluxation and compression of vital structures. Grisel's syndrome needs to be treated multidisciplinary and immediately.

A Rapid Method for Detection of Antigen-Specific B Cells.

The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has united the efforts of many scientists all over the world to develop wet-lab techniques and computational approaches aimed at the identification of antigen-specific T and B cells. The latter provide specific humoral immunity that is essential for the survival of COVID-19 patients, and vaccine development has essentially been based on these cells. Here, we implemented an approach that integrates the sorting of antigen-specific B cells and B-cell receptor mRNA sequencing (BCR-seq), followed by computational analysis. This rapid and cost-efficient method allowed us to identify antigen-specific B cells in the peripheral blood of patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Subsequently, specific BCRs were extracted, cloned, and produced as full antibodies. We confirmed their reactivity toward the spike RBD domain. Such an approach can be effective for the monitoring and identification of B cells participating in an individual immune response.

Frequency and prognosis of CVD and myocardial injury in patients presenting with suspected COVID-19 - The CoV-COR registry.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an alteration of algorithms in emergency medicine, which may influence the management of patients with similar symptoms but underlying cardiovascular diseases. We evaluated key differential diagnoses to acute COVID-19 infection and the prevalence and the prognosis of myocardial injury in patients presenting for suspected COIVD-19 infection. Methods: This prospective observational study includes patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. In patients without COVID-19, leading diagnoses was classified according to ICD-10. Myocardial injury was defined as elevated high-sensitivity Troponin I with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit and its prevalence together with 90-days mortality rate was compared in patients with vs without COVID-infection. Results: From 497 included patients (age 62.9 ± 17.2 years, 56 % male), 314 (63 %) were tested positive on COVID-19 based on PCR-testing, while another cause of symptom was detected in 183 patients (37 %). Cardiovascular diseases were the most frequent differential diagnoses (40 % of patients without COVID-19), followed by bacterial infection (24 %) and malignancies (16 %). Myocardial injury was present in 91 patients (COVID-19 positive: n = 34, COVID-19 negative: n = 57). 90-day mortality rate was higher in patients with myocardial injury (13.4 vs 4.6 %, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Cardiovascular diseases represent the most frequent differential diagnoses in patients presenting to a tertiary care emergency department with symptoms suggestive of an acute infection. Screening for cardiovascular disease is crucial in the initial evaluation of symptomatic patients during the COVID pandemic to identify patients at increased risk.Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04327479.

Cognitive dysfunction following COVID-19 infection.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is still evolving, causing hundreds of millions of infections around the world. The long-term sequelae of COVID-19 and neurologic syndromes post COVID remain poorly understood. The present study aims to characterize cognitive performance in patients experiencing cognitive symptoms post-COVID infection. Patients evaluated at a post COVID clinic in Northern Israel who endorsed cognitive symptoms were referred for neurologic consultation. The neurologic work-up included detailed medical history, symptom inventory, neurological examination, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), laboratory tests and brain CT or MRI. Between December 2020 and June 2021, 46 patients were referred for neurological consultation (65% female), mean age 49.5 (19-72 years). On the MoCA test, executive functions, particularly phonemic fluency, and attention, were impaired. In contrast, the total MoCA score, and memory and orientation subscores did not differ from expected ranges. Disease severity, premorbid condition, pulmonary function tests and hypoxia did not contribute to cognitive performance. Cognitive decline may affect otherwise healthy patients post-COVID, independent of disease severity. Our examination identified abnormalities in executive function, attention, and phonemic fluency. These findings occurred despite normal laboratory tests and imaging findings.

SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody seroprevalence rates among Egyptian blood donors around the third wave: Cross‐sectional study

BackgroundSeroprevalence studies may provide a more representative situation of the disease burden and population‐level immunity in a country.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies among asymptomatic blood donors attending the Cairo University blood bank services at various points in time around the third wave.MethodsThis cross‐section study included 3058 eligible blood donors, representing a demographically and socially heterogeneous healthy population and categorized as: Group 1, 954 donors in the period from March 20 to 30/2021;Group 2, 990 donors in the period from June 3 to 10/2021. These two groups were tested for IgG against SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid antigen (NC) to detect qualitative reactivity. Group 3, 1114 donors in the period from July 20 to 30/2021 were tested by the SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG II Quant assay for the quantitative detection of IgG antibodies, including neutralizing antibodies (antispike antibodies).ResultsDonors' age ranged between 18 and 59 (mean 33.9 ± 9) years. There was no significant correlation between seroprevalence and gender, area of residence, ABO or Rh blood types, and occupation or education. Antibody prevalence was found to be 13.2% in Group 1, 19.2% in Group 2 (overall 16.2%), and 66% in Group 3. There were only 49 included cases vaccinated against COVID‐19.ConclusionWe concluded that the significant increasing trend in seroprevalence rates during the third wave, March, June, and July, in Egypt, reflects a high cumulative incidence of seroconversion that mirrored the epidemic curve in its rise, fall, and nadir.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence rates among Egyptian blood donors around the third wave: Cross-sectional study.

Background: Seroprevalence studies may provide a more representative situation of the disease burden and population-level immunity in a country. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies among asymptomatic blood donors attending the Cairo University blood bank services at various points in time around the third wave. Methods: This cross-section study included 3058 eligible blood donors, representing a demographically and socially heterogeneous healthy population and categorized as: Group 1, 954 donors in the period from March 20 to 30/2021; Group 2, 990 donors in the period from June 3 to 10/2021. These two groups were tested for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen (NC) to detect qualitative reactivity. Group 3, 1114 donors in the period from July 20 to 30/2021 were tested by the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay for the quantitative detection of IgG antibodies, including neutralizing antibodies (antispike antibodies). Results: Donors' age ranged between 18 and 59 (mean 33.9 ± 9) years. There was no significant correlation between seroprevalence and gender, area of residence, ABO or Rh blood types, and occupation or education. Antibody prevalence was found to be 13.2% in Group 1, 19.2% in Group 2 (overall 16.2%), and 66% in Group 3. There were only 49 included cases vaccinated against COVID-19. Conclusion: We concluded that the significant increasing trend in seroprevalence rates during the third wave, March, June, and July, in Egypt, reflects a high cumulative incidence of seroconversion that mirrored the epidemic curve in its rise, fall, and nadir.

Factors influencing the acquisition of COVID infection among high-risk contacts of COVID-19 patients in Madurai district-A case control study.

Introduction: COVID is a new disease; understanding the transmission dynamics and epidemiological characteristics may help in developing the effective control measures. The study is done 1. To determine the various factors influencing the acquisition of COVID-19 infection among high-risk contacts 2. To estimate the secondary attack rate among high-risk contacts 3. To determine the factors in COVID index cases influencing their secondary attack rate. Methodology: Unmatched case control study was conducted from March to August 2020 among 139 COVID index cases in Madurai district from March-May (Reference period) and their 50 COVID positive (cases), 551 COVID negative (controls) high-risk contacts. Case investigation form* and contact tracing Proforma*were used to collect data. Chi-square test and independent sample t test were used to find out the association. Univariate* and Multivariate logistic regression* were used to predict the risk of various factors in acquisition of COVID infection with the help of adjusted and unadjusted odds ratio. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Male contacts (P = 0.005, OR = 2.520), overcrowding (P = 0.007, OR = 3.810), and duration of exposure to index case (for 4-7 days P = 0.014, OR = 2.902, for >7 days P = 0.001, OR = 6.748 and for > 12 hours/day P = 0.000, OR = 5.543) were significant factors predicted to be associated with acquisition of COVID infection among high-risk contacts. Reproductive number (R0)* estimated was 1.3. Secondary attack rate (SAR)* estimated among high-risk contacts was 8.32%. Index cases whose outcome was death (P = 0.026); symptomatic index cases (P = 0.000), cases with fever (P = 0.001); sorethroat (P = 0.019); breathlessness (P = 0.010); cough (P = 0.006) and running nose (P = 0.002) had significantly higher mean SAR than their counterparts. Conclusion: Contacts with above said risk factors who were found to be more prone to infection could be given special focus to prevent the transmission in them.

Acute psychosis associated with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case report.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created overwhelming circumstances not only in the medical field, but in other walks of life. SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus of COVID-19 [1], primarily affects the respiratory system leading to respiratory illnesses of varying severity ranging from mild flu-like symptoms to acute respiratory distress syndrome [2]. However, the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are not limited to the respiratory system [3]. There is a growing body of literature showing the incidence of a varying clinical spectrum of neuropsychiatric manifestations in a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients [4]. With the variability in neuropsychiatric presentation of COVID- 19, multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology of these presentations [5]. In this case report, we present a 20-year-old female with no significant respiratory symptoms or previous history of psychotic episodes who manifested with acute psychosis as a significant complication of COVID-19.

Correlation of chest radiography findings with the severity and progression of COVID-19 pneumonia.

PURPOSE: Aim is to assess the temporal changes and prognostic value of chest radiograph (CXR) in COVID-19 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of confirmed COVID-19 patients presented to the emergency between March 07-17, 2020. Clinical & radiological findings were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were classified into critical & non-critical based on severity. Two independent radiologists graded frontal view CXRs into COVID-19 pneumonia category 1 (CoV-P1) with <4 zones and CoV-P2 with ≥4 zones involvement. Interobserver agreement of CoV-P category for the CXR preceding the clinical outcome was assessed using Kendall's τ coefficient. Association between CXR findings and clinical deterioration was calculated along with temporal changes of CXR findings with disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were evaluated for clinical features. 56 of these (total: 325 CXRs) were evaluated for radiological findings. Common patterns were progression from lower to upper zones, peripheral to diffuse involvement, & from ground glass opacities to consolidation. Consolidations starting peripherally were noted in 76%, 93% and 48% with critical outcomes, respectively. The interobserver agreement of the CoV-P category of CXRs in the critical and non-critical outcome groups were good and excellent, respectively (τ coefficient = 0.6 & 1.0). Significant association was observed between CoV-P2 and clinical deterioration into a critical status (χ2 = 27.7, p = 0.0001) with high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (71%) within a median interval time of 2 days (range: 0-4 days). CONCLUSION: Involvement of predominantly 4 or more zones on frontal chest radiograph can be used as predictive prognostic indicator of poorer outcome in COVID-19 patients.